Inclusive and extractive economic institutions
"Inclusive
economic institutions, such as those in South Korea or in the United
States, are those that allow and encourage participation by the great
mass of people in economic activities that make best use of their
talents and skills
and that enable individuals to make the choices they wish. To be
inclusive, economic institutions must feature secure private
property, an unbiased system of law, and a provision of public
services that provides a level playing field in which people can
exchange and contract; it also must permit the entry of new
businesses and allow people to choose their careers."
"...Inclusive
economic institutions require secure property rights and economic
opportunities not just for the elite but for a broad cross-section of
society.
Secure
property rights, the law, public services, and the freedom to
contract and exchange all rely on the state, the institution with the
coercive capacity to impose order, prevent theft
and fraud,
and enforce contracts between private parties. To function well,
society also needs other public services: roads and a transport
network so that goods can be transported; a public infrastructure so
that economic
activity can flourish; and some type of basic regulation to prevent
fraud
and malfeasance.
Though many of these public services can be provided by markets and
private citizens, the degree of coordination necessary to do so
on a large scale often eludes all but a central authority.
The
state is thus inexorably intertwined with economic institutions, as
the enforcer of law and order, private property, and contracts, and
often as a key provider of public
services. Inclusive economic institutions need and use the state."
"...We
call such institutions, which have opposite properties to those we
call inclusive, extractive
economic institutions—extractive because such institutions are
designed to extract incomes and wealth from one subset of society to
benefit a different subset."
Engines of prosperity"
"...Inclusive
economic institutions create inclusive
markets, which not only give people freedom to pursue
the vocations in life that best suit their talents but also provide a
level playing field that gives them the opportunity to do so. Those
who have good ideas will be able to start businesses, workers will
tend to go to activities where their productivity is greater, and
less efficient firms can be replaced by more efficient
ones"
"...Inclusive
markets are not just free markets. Barbados in the seventeenth
century also had markets. But in the same way that it lacked property
rights for all but the narrow planter elite, its markets were far
from inclusive"
"...Inclusive
economic institutions also pave the way for two other engines of
prosperity: technology and education."
"...The
price these nations pay for low education of their population and
lack of inclusive markets is high. They fail to mobilize their
nascent talent. They have many potential Bill Gateses and perhaps one
or two Albert Einsteins who are now working as poor, uneducated
farmers, being coerced to do what they don’t want to do or being
drafted into the army, because they never had the opportunity to
realize their
vocation in life.
The
ability of economic institutions to harness the potential of
inclusive markets, encourage technological innovation, invest in
people, and mobilize the talents and skills
of a large number of individuals is critical for economic growth"
Inclusive and extractive political institutions
"All
economic institutions are created by society...different people with
different interests and objectives made the decisions about how to
structure society...
Politics
is the process by which a society chooses the rules that will govern
it. Politics surrounds institutions for the simple reason that while
inclusive institutions may be good for the economic prosperity of a
nation, some people or groups,...will be much better off by setting
up institutions that are extractive.
When
there is conflict over institutions, what happens depends on which
people or group wins out in the game of politics—who can get more
support, obtain additional resources,
and form more effective alliances. In short, who wins depends on the
distribution of political power in society.
The
political institutions of a society are a key determinant of the
outcome of this game. They are the rules that govern incentives in
politics. They determine how the government
is chosen and which part of the government has the right to do what.
Political institutions determine who has power in society and to what
ends that power can be used. If the distribution of power is narrow
and unconstrained, then the political institutions are absolutist, as
exemplified by the absolutist monarchies reigning throughout the
world during much of history."
"...political
institutions that distribute power broadly in society and subject it
to constraints are pluralistic. Instead of being vested in a single
individual or a narrow
group, political power rests with a broad coalition or a plurality of
groups.
There
is obviously a close connection between pluralism and inclusive
economic institutions."
"...the
key to understanding why South Korea and the United States have
inclusive economic institutions is not just their pluralistic
political institutions but also their sufficiently centralized
and powerful states."
"...political
power in Somalia has long been widely distributed—almost
pluralistic.
Indeed there is no real authority that can control or sanction what
anyone does.
Society
is divided into deeply antagonistic clans that cannot dominate one
another. The power of one clan is constrained only by the guns of
another. This distribution of power leads not to inclusive
institutions but to chaos, and at the root of it is the Somali
state’s lack of any kind of political centralization, or state
centralization, and its inability to enforce even the minimal amount
of law and order to support economic activity, trade, or even the
basic security of its citizens"
"… We
will refer to political institutions that are sufficiently
centralized and pluralistic as inclusive political institutions.
When
either of these conditions fails, we will refer to the institutions
as extractive political institutions.
There
is strong synergy between economic and political institutions.
Extractive political institutions concentrate power in the hands of a
narrow elite and place few constraints
on the exercise of this power. Economic institutions are then often
structured by this elite to extract resources from the rest of the
society. Extractive economic institutions thus naturally accompany
extractive political institutions. In fact, they must inherently
depend on extractive political institutions for their survival.
Inclusive political institutions, vesting power broadly, would tend
to uproot economic institutions that expropriate the resources of the
many, erect entry barriers, and suppress the functioning of markets
so that only a few benefit."
"...This
synergistic relationship between extractive economic and political
institutions introduces a strong feedback loop: political
institutions enable the elites controlling political power to choose
economic institutions with few constraints or opposing forces. They
also enable the elites to structure future political institutions and
their evolution.
Extractive economic institutions, in turn, enrich the same elites,
and their economic wealth and power help consolidate their political
dominance."
"...Inclusive
economic institutions, in turn, are forged on foundations laid by
inclusive political institutions, which make power broadly
distributed in society and constrain its arbitrary exercise. Such
political institutions also make it harder for others to usurp power
and undermine the foundations of inclusive institutions. Those
controlling political power cannot easily use it to set up extractive
economic institutions for their own benefit. Inclusive economic
institutions, in turn, create a more equitable distribution of
resources, facilitating the persistence of inclusive political
institutions."
"...Economic
institutions that create incentives for economic progress may
simultaneously redistribute income and power in such a way that a
predatory dictator and others with political power may become worse
off."
"...creative
destruction. They replace the old with the new. New sectors attract
resources away from old ones. New firms take business away from
established ones. New technologies make existing skills and machines
obsolete. The process of economic growth and the inclusive
institutions upon which it is based create losers
as well as winners in the political arena and in the economic
marketplace. Fear of creative destruction is often at the root of the
opposition to inclusive economic and political institutions."
"...In
Somalia, power is evenly balanced, and no one clan can impose its
will on any other. Therefore, the lack of political centralization
persists."
"The long agony of the Congo"
"The
institution of slavery meant that the most fundamental
market of all, an inclusive labor market where people can choose
their occupation or jobs in ways that are so crucial for a prosperous
economy, did not exist."
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου